While I suspect this belief is embraced by many because it gives them a neat justification for using power, I do not want to discredit the belief as a mere rationalization. There is some truth in the belief and so it must be examined rather carefully.
Common sense and experience strongly support the idea that children do want limits in their relationship with parents. They need to know how far they can go before their behavior will be unacceptable. Only then can they choose not to engage in such behaviors. This applies to all human relationships.
For example, I am much more secure when I know which of my behaviors are unacceptable to my wife. One that comes to mind is playing golf or going to my office to work on a day when we entertain guests. By knowing ahead of time that my absence will be unacceptable because my wife needs my help, I can choose not to play golf or go to the office and avoid her displeasure or anger and probably a conflict.
However, it is one thing for a child to want to know the "limits of her parents' acceptance" and an entirely different thing to say that she wants her parent to set those limits on her behavior. To return to the example involving my wife and me: I am helped when I know her feelings about my playing golf or going to the office on days we entertain. But I certainly will bristle and be resentful if she tries to set a limit on my behavior by some such statement as, "I cannot permit you to play golf or go to the office on days we are having guests. That's a limit. You are not to do those things."
I would not appreciate this power approach at all. It is ridiculous to suppose that my wife would even try to control and direct my behavior this way. Children respond no differently to limit setting on the part of the parent. Equally strong is their bristling and resentment when a parent unilaterally tries to set a limit on their behavior. I have never known a child who wants a parent to set a limit on her behavior like this:
"You must be in by midnight--that's my limit."
"I cannot permit you to take the car."
"You cannot play with your truck in the living room."
"We must demand that you not smoke pot."
"We have to restrict you from going with those two boys."
The reader will recognize all these communications as our familiar "sending the solution" (also, all are You-Messages).
A much sounder principle than "children want their parents to use their authority and set limits" is the following:
Children want and need information from their parents that will tell them the parent's feelings about their behavior. so that they themselves can modify behavior that might be unacceptable to the parents. However, children do not want the parent to try to limit or modify their behavior by using or threatening to use their authority. In short, children want to limit their behavior themselves if it becomes apparent to them that their behavior must be limited or modified. Children, like adults, prefer to be their own authority over their behavior.
One further point: children actually would prefer that all their behavior were acceptable to their parents, so that it would be unnecessary to limit or modify any of their behavior. I, too, would prefer that my wife would find all my behavior unconditionally acceptable. That's what I would prefer, but I know it is not only unrealistic, but impossible.
So parents should not expect, nor will their children expect of them, that they will be accepting of all behavior. What children have a right to expect, however, is that they always be told when their parents are not feeling accepting of a certain behavior (I don't like to be tugged and pulled when I'm talking to a friend"). This is quite different from wanting parents to use authority to set limits on their behavior.*
*An excerpt from Dr. Thomas Gordon's P.E.T., Parent Effectiveness Training book
i think you might be over-expanding this concept. as a parent, it is our responsibility to teach children how to live in society. it is a totally different concept to teach a child to not burp or fart at the dinner table rather than 'don't play golf when the family is in town'. by teaching and enforcing societal rules the point is to teach children how to effectively interact with others rather than being a egotistical maniac. by teaching limits kids learn how to think of the reaching effects of their actions, and how their actions make others feel. unless i am parenting in a different way than most parents are, learning to limit your own behavior (regardless of feelings) and thinking of others is a major milestone setting human society apart from animal packs.
ReplyDeleteIt sounds like you feel there is most certainly a time when societal rules and limits need to be taught. It seems like the feeling you get from reading this is that we may be "splitting hairs", so to speak. You feel that if children are NOT shown certain obvious limits, that they run the risk of turning into a grown-up spoiled brat. We hear you. We also AGREE with you. It's not at all our belief that children should not be taught limitations and socially acceptable standards. Rather, we believe that the METHOD in which they are taught - modeled versus imposed - will bring about much greater compliance and long-term adaptation. Check out the Chapter 10 of the P.E.T. book for more on this concept. :)
Deletehttp://www.gordontraining.com/store/best-sellers/parent-effectiveness-training-p-e-t-book-3/